The New Agora paper states that
there are seven modules to the architecture of SDDP which are comprised of 31
component constraints as stated in Schreibman
and Christakis’ New Agora: New Geometry of Languaging and New Technology of Democracy: *The Structured Design Dialogue Process:
1. 6 Consensus Methods: (1)
Nominal Group Technique (NGT), (2)
Interpretive Structural Modeling
(ISM), (3) DELPHI, (4) OPtions Field, (5)
Options Profile, and (6) Trade-off
Analysis (Years 1972-1982);
2. 7 Language Patterns: (1)
Eelemental observations; (3) Problématique,
(3) Influence tree-pattern, (4)
OPtions field pattern, (5) OPtions
profile/scenario pattern, (6)
Superposition pattern, and (7) Action plan
pattern (Years 1970-1980);
3. 3 Application Time Phases:
(1) Discovery, (2) Designing, and (3) Action
(Years 1989-2001;
4. 3 Key Role Responsibilities:
(1) Context—Inquiry Design Team, (2)
Content— Stakeholders/Designers, and
(3) Process—Facilitation Team
(Years 1982-2002);
5. 4 Stages of Interactive
Inquiry: (1) Definition or Anticipation, (2) Design
of Alternatives, (3) Decision, and
(4) Action Planning (Years 1989-1995);
6. Collaborative Software and
Facility (Years 1981-1995);
7. 6 Dialogue Laws: (1)
Requisite Variety )Ashby), (2) Parsimony (Miller),
(3) Saliency (Boulding), (4) Meaning
and Wisdom (Peirce, (5)
Authenticity and Autonomy
(Tsivacou), and (6) Evolutionary Learning
(Dye) (Years
2001-2003).
This
architecture is built around the basis of the following:
4 Axioms
to Assure Sound Foundations for the Science:
·
COMPLEXITY:
We live in a world that is very complex.
Most observers are confused.
Social systems design issues are strongly interconnected (Warfield).
·
PARSIMONY:
Human cognition & attention is limited.
Human beings are usually overloaded in group design meetings leading to
bad designs (Simon).
·
SALIENCY:
The field of options in designing social systems is multidimensional. Salient
synthesis is difficult (Boulding).
·
ENGAGEMENT:
Disregarding the participation of the stakeholders in designing social systems
is unethical, and the designs are bound to fail (Ozbekhan).
o
However
Stakeholders tend to try and solve a problem before its complexity is fully
understood, but how complex is complex?
The Situational Complexity Index is defined as
DK (N-7) / R (R-1) where D =
(V-5) / (N-5)
N = Number of total observations by all observers
R = Number of observations INCLUDED IN THE PROBLEMATIQUE (Influence Map)
V = Number of observations with 1 or more votes
K = Number of DISTINCT links among observations
D = Divergence or “spread think” of importance votes
_________________________________
7
is the “Miller number” (7 ± 2) “which is the limited individual capacity for short-term processing
of information”
and 5 is the
“Warfield spread think number”
6 Methods
to Build Consensus :
1) Nominal
Group Technique
2) Interpretive
Structural Modeling
3) DELPHI
4) Options
Field
5) Options
Profile
6) Trade-off
Analysis
7 Patterns
of Graphic Language:
1) Elemental
Observation
2) Problematique
(A mess)
3) Influence
Tree (Root Cause Map)
4) Options
Field
5) Options
Profile / Scenario
6) Superposition
Pattern
7) Action
Plan Pattern
4 Stages
of Interactive Inquiry:
1) Definition
or Anticipation
2) Design
of Alternatives
3) Decision
4) Action
Planning
7 Laws of Effective
Dialogue
1)
Requisite Variety (Ashby)
2)
Requisite Parsimony (Miller, Warfield)
3)
Requisite Saliency (Boulding)
4)
Requisite Meaning & Wisdom (Peirce)
5)
Requisite Authenticity & Autonomy (Tsivacou)
6)
Requisite Evolutionary Learning (Dye)
Schreibman and Christakis show 6 Laws of
Dialogue but
Christakis added a 7th law in
his presentation on Harnessing Collective Wisdom.
7)
Requisite Action (Laouris)
My area of
interest or innovation is in combining meteorology and holographic projection
or Holographic Weather Analysis and Prediction system (HWAPs) as I call it. Using the SDDP method I am considering on
using the Delphi approach in building my consensus, with an options/scenario
pattern of graphic language; definition and anticipation type inquiry and the
requisite evolutionary learning.
New Agora Paper
http://www.harnessingcollectivewisdom.com/pdf/newagora.pdf
New Agora Paper
http://www.harnessingcollectivewisdom.com/pdf/newagora.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment